Lanchester R&DTactical Exploration Lab
Coordination Systems
Family TechWidgetUtilityResource Sync

supergramp

Glanceable availability widget for family resource synchronization.

supergramp Diagnostic
IMG_REF // SUPERGRAMP

Problem Defined

"Generational care nodes are under-utilized due to coordination friction."

01

Strategic Context

Families waste cycles on simple availability checks.

02

Competitive Imbalance

Messaging friction prevents dynamic resource use.

03

System Hypothesis

A single-purpose widget eliminates informal childcare overhead.

04

Process Architecture

How the system was designed, tested, and refined.

01

DEFINE

Objective

Identify coordination friction in family resource synchronization.

What We Did
  • Audited family caregiver schedules
  • Interviewed generational nodes
  • Mapped availability gaps
What Failed
  • Assumed the friction was technical, it was actually psychological
What We Learned
  • The barrier is the "ask"; system must make availability passive
What We Adjusted
  • Pivoted to a glanceable widget model for passive visibility
02

MAP

Objective

Map calendar signals to glanceable status indicators.

What We Did
  • Mapped calendar availability triggers
  • Designed widget status states
What Failed
  • Initial status codes were too professional/clinical for family use
What We Learned
  • Tone matters in domestic coordination
What We Adjusted
  • Simplified status to "Available", "Focus", "Away" with custom icons
03

VALIDATE

Objective

Test spontaneous resource utilization.

What We Did
  • Tested widget with 10 extended family networks
  • Measured spontaneous bookings
What Failed
  • Users forgot to update status manually
What We Learned
  • Visibility MUST be automated or synced to existing behaviors
What We Adjusted
  • Integrated bi-directional calendar sync as the primary driver
04

EXECUTE

Objective

Build the glanceable widget and sync layer.

What We Built
  • iOS widget layer
  • Calendar sync engine
  • Push signal system
What Failed
  • Over-engineered the detail views
What We Learned
  • The widget is the product; the app is just config
What We Adjusted
  • Focused 90% of development effort on widget glanceability
05

MEASURE

Objective

Calculate reduction in synchronization overhead.

Metrics Tracked
  • Update frequency
  • Booking ratio
  • Message volume reduction
What Failed
  • Early data was skewed by the novelty effect
What We Learned
  • Sustained use requires zero-touch maintenance
What We Adjusted
  • Introduced historical likelihood forecasting to auto-populate status

Rule Application

How doctrine was operationalized.

Intellectual Rigor
01_INT
Applied By
  • Defining familial friction points
  • Mapping generational nodes
Evidence

80% reduction in sync overhead achieved in pilot groups

Tactical Execution
02_TAC
Applied By
  • Shipping single-purpose widget first
  • Short sync cycles
Evidence

Widget live on testflight in 7 days

Human Calibration
03_HUM
Applied By
  • Reducing the "burden of asking"
  • Designing for glanceable awareness
Evidence

Zero manual scheduling messages required for 5x increase in resource use

Machine Leverage
04_AI
Applied By
  • Likelihood forecasting based on historical routines
  • Anomaly detection in schedules
Evidence

AI predicts availability shifts before they are manually logged

05

Product Architecture

Calendar synchronization and low-friction mobile widgets.

supergramp Architecture
System Schematic // V-01
06

AI Leverage

Likelihood forecasting based on historical routines.

07

Outcomes & Learnings

Eliminated noise and increased shared resource visibility.