Lanchester R&DTactical Exploration Lab
Market & Asset Optimization
MarketplaceSocialEventsMatching

Extra Ticket

Converting spare event assets into high-leverage matching opportunities.

Extra Ticket Diagnostic
IMG_REF // EXTRA-TICKET

Problem Defined

"Dormant event capacity lacks a low-friction discovery mechanic."

01

Strategic Context

Wasted event capacity represents lost economic opportunity.

02

Competitive Imbalance

Markets ignore the social value of shared experience.

03

System Hypothesis

Structuring spare tickets as entry points increases utilization.

04

Process Architecture

How the system was designed, tested, and refined.

01

DEFINE

Objective

Identify dormant asset capacity in cultural events.

What We Did
  • Audited ticket wastage data
  • Interviewed event organizers
  • Mapped secondary utility
What Failed
  • Focused on resale profit, ignored social proximity value
What We Learned
  • The real value is matching the asset to the right peer, not just the highest bidder
What We Adjusted
  • Reframed as a social matching marketplace
02

MAP

Objective

Map asset availability to social proximity graphs.

What We Did
  • Created matching algorithm diagrams
  • Mapped trust verification flows
What Failed
  • Initial models ignored the logistical friction of on-site handovers
What We Learned
  • Markets fail without low-friction physical coordination
What We Adjusted
  • Added proximity-based matching alerts
03

VALIDATE

Objective

Test utilization of spare capacity via peer matching.

What We Did
  • Ran pilot at 5 major cultural events
  • Measured asset liquidity
What Failed
  • Users were hesitant to match with strangers without trust anchors
What We Learned
  • Trust is the currency of peer asset exchange
What We Adjusted
  • Integrated social verification and trust scoring
04

EXECUTE

Objective

Build the matching and verification engine.

What We Built
  • Asset matching engine
  • Trust verification layer
  • Proximity alert system
What Failed
  • Over-built the payment infrastructure initially
What We Learned
  • Discovery and trust are more important than transaction speed early on
What We Adjusted
  • Prioritized social proximity over financial clearing
05

MEASURE

Objective

Calculate utilization rate and social utility.

Metrics Tracked
  • Utilization rate
  • Matching NPS
  • Velocity of exchange
What Failed
  • Metrics ignored the long-term community value
What We Learned
  • Repeat matching is the leading indicator of ecosystem health
What We Adjusted
  • Introduced network effect tracking for asset nodes

Rule Application

How doctrine was operationalized.

Intellectual Rigor
01_INT
Applied By
  • Mapping secondary utility cycles
  • Defining measurable matching friction
Evidence

85% utilization of dormant tickets achieved in pilot phase

Tactical Execution
02_TAC
Applied By
  • Shipping MVP matching engine first
  • Focusing on high-density events
Evidence

First match achieved within 4 hours of deployment

Human Calibration
03_HUM
Applied By
  • Reducing social friction in peer exchange
  • Designing around event-day behaviors
Evidence

4.8/5 matching quality via trust-first architecture

Machine Leverage
04_AI
Applied By
  • Preference-based matching optimization
  • Predictive demand signaling
Evidence

AI identifies ideal peer matches based on latent preferences

05

Product Architecture

Ticket engine, match-making algorithm, trust verification.

Extra Ticket Architecture
System Schematic // V-01
06

AI Leverage

Preference-based matching for event optimization.

07

Outcomes & Learnings

Extracted social utility from dormant assets.