Lanchester R&DTactical Exploration Lab
Operational Intelligence
Field ProductionAI-AugmentedLogistics

ShootAtlas

Logistics intelligence for complex field production.

ShootAtlas Diagnostic
IMG_REF // SHOOTATLAS

Problem Defined

"Information silos in field productions cause resource waste and schedule drift."

01

Strategic Context

On-location media operates in vacuums, creating logistical chaos.

02

Competitive Imbalance

Spreadsheets fail to capture real-time field data.

03

System Hypothesis

A unified intelligence layer converts fragmented signals into actionable maps.

04

Process Architecture

How the system was designed, tested, and refined.

01

DEFINE

Objective

Identify information silos in complex field productions.

What We Did
  • On-site production audits
  • Workflow mapping of location crews
  • Analyzed schedule drift data
What Failed
  • Underestimated the speed of on-set pivots
  • Assumed stable connectivity in remote zones
What We Learned
  • Central intelligence must be asynchronous by default
What We Adjusted
  • Designed for offline-first data persistence
02

MAP

Objective

Visualize the resource and schedule dependencies.

What We Did
  • Created dependency graphs for assets and talent
  • Mapped signal flow from field to HQ
What Failed
  • Initial maps were too linear for chaotic media workflows
What We Learned
  • Production is recursive; maps must reflect circular feedback
What We Adjusted
  • Updated system map to include multi-path escalation triggers
03

VALIDATE

Objective

Test unified intelligence layer with active production teams.

What We Did
  • Deployed mobile prototypes to location crews
  • Simulated resource failures to test response
What Failed
  • Crews rejected high-friction data entry requirements
What We Learned
  • Data capture must be incidental to the workflow
What We Adjusted
  • Integrated automated signal detection to reduce manual input
04

EXECUTE

Objective

Build the production orchestration layer.

What We Built
  • Resource tracking system
  • Risk detection engine
  • Asynchronous sync layer
What Failed
  • Over-built the feature set for talent management initially
What We Learned
  • Precision in logistics beats breadth in HR tools
What We Adjusted
  • Focused on critical resource pathing and schedule stability
05

MEASURE

Objective

Assess reduction in logistical waste and drift.

Metrics Tracked
  • Schedule variance
  • Resource utilization
  • Information clarity
What Failed
  • Vanity metrics obscured actual operational efficiency early on
What We Learned
  • Hours shaved per cycle is the only metric that matters to heads of production
What We Adjusted
  • Refined KPIs to focus on time-to-resolution for field signals

Rule Application

How doctrine was operationalized.

Intellectual Rigor
01_INT
Applied By
  • Mapping every logistical node before development
  • Defining measurable friction
Evidence

Zero critical resource failures recorded after deployment

Tactical Execution
02_TAC
Applied By
  • Iterative field testing in remote conditions
  • Focusing on core logistical engine
Evidence

Core tracking live 2 weeks before UI completion

Human Calibration
03_HUM
Applied By
  • Designing for low-attention environments
  • Prioritizing glanceable data
Evidence

Signal-based UI reduced field-to-HQ communication volume by 40%

Machine Leverage
04_AI
Applied By
  • AI risk detection for schedule drift
  • Pattern recognition in field signals
Evidence

AI predicts bottle-necks before they hit the daily call sheet

05

Product Architecture

Schedule orchestration, inventory tracking, AI risk detection.

ShootAtlas Architecture
System Schematic // V-01
06

AI Leverage

Anticipates production risks from field signals.

07

Outcomes & Learnings

Eliminated scheduling drift and secured signal clarity.