Lanchester R&DTactical Exploration Lab
Market & Asset Optimization
CVResaleValuationFintech

photosell

AI valuation system identifying high-value possessions.

photosell Diagnostic
IMG_REF // PHOTOSELL

Problem Defined

"Household assets remain dead because valuation is too high-friction."

01

Strategic Context

Households lack the knowledge to monetize dormant assets.

02

Competitive Imbalance

High cognitive cost prevents resale market entry.

03

System Hypothesis

Automating identification via CV lowers the barrier to entry.

04

Process Architecture

How the system was designed, tested, and refined.

01

DEFINE

Objective

Identify cognitive barriers to household asset liquefaction.

What We Did
  • Audited resale market entry friction
  • Observed household inventory patterns
  • Mapped valuation latency
What Failed
  • Assumed the barrier was shipping, it was actually valuation effort
What We Learned
  • If valuation takes >30 seconds, the asset remains dormant
What We Adjusted
  • Pivoted to a Computer Vision-first identification model
02

MAP

Objective

Map CV pipeline to real-time market pricing indices.

What We Did
  • Created image classification flows
  • Mapped pricing API integrations
What Failed
  • Initial maps were too optimistic about object condition detection
What We Learned
  • Condition is subjective; system must allow for tiered valuation
What We Adjusted
  • Added multi-state condition assessment to the CV loop
03

VALIDATE

Objective

Test identification precision and conversion speed.

What We Did
  • Ran tests with 500 household items
  • Measured "snap-to-price" velocity
What Failed
  • Users found the categorization too generic
What We Learned
  • Users value market-specific metadata over generic labels
What We Adjusted
  • Tuned AI to pull channel-specific attributes (e.g. eBay/Reverb)
04

EXECUTE

Objective

Build the CV pipeline and pricing indexer.

What We Built
  • CV classification engine
  • Pricing aggregation layer
  • Snap-to-sell UI
What Failed
  • Over-engineered the listing automation features early on
What We Learned
  • Accuracy in valuation is the hook; ease of listing is the closer
What We Adjusted
  • Focused on sub-second classification and price confidence
05

MEASURE

Objective

Calculate liquidation velocity and reclaimed equity.

Metrics Tracked
  • Identification precision
  • Valuation accuracy
  • Time-to-list
What Failed
  • Metrics didn't account for items that were identified but not sold
What We Learned
  • Confidence in price is the primary driver of sell-intent
What We Adjusted
  • Introduced a "price confidence score" for every asset

Rule Application

How doctrine was operationalized.

Intellectual Rigor
01_INT
Applied By
  • Mapping resale market graphs
  • Defining measurable friction in valuation
Evidence

$1,200 average reclaimed equity per active trial user

Tactical Execution
02_TAC
Applied By
  • Shipping the CV scanner first
  • Short iteration on classification accuracy
Evidence

Scanning engine achieved 90% precision in 3 weeks

Human Calibration
03_HUM
Applied By
  • Reducing the cognitive load of inventories
  • Designing for rapid "snap" sessions
Evidence

Liquidation velocity increased by 60% vs traditional listing

Machine Leverage
04_AI
Applied By
  • Using CV for classification and condition detection
  • Automated market estimation
Evidence

AI eliminates the need for manual research on asset value

05

Product Architecture

Computer vision pipeline, pricing indexer, channel integration.

photosell Architecture
System Schematic // V-01
06

AI Leverage

CV classification and automated market estimation.

07

Outcomes & Learnings

Lowered the barrier for converting clutter into capital.